Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Marco Rubio. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Marco Rubio. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, febrero 18

Senador, y Latinoamérica ¿qué?

Tanto Jordania como Israel son aliados de Estados Unidos. Sus gobiernos son importantes para Washington porque son aliados en una región donde el 'antiamericanismo' es muy fuerte. Pero ni los jordanos o los israelíes dan de comer a los estadounidenses. Ni limpian sus casas o sus coches. Ni siquiera arman los arreglos florales de sus entierros.

Quien los alimentan, limpian y los entierran son los mexicanos, los colombianos, los salvadoreños, los costarricenses, los cubanos y la generalidad de los inmigrantes hispanos que realizan aquellas tareas que los demás no quieren hacer. En los campos, en los ranchos, en nuestras calles y cementerios. No es cualquier uno que dobla el lomo de sol a sol, pero los que lo doblan acá tienen un impacto mucho más claro y presente en la vida de todos nosotros que los jordanos o los israelíes.

Esta semana el senador cubanoamericano Marco Rubio (R-FL), que ahora aboga por una aproximación hacia los hispanos, se ha ido de viaje a Jordania e Israel. Es la segunda vez que se aparece por Jerusalén. Me parece bien. Él es miembro del Comité de Relaciones Exteriores del Senado, y toda atención es poca. Pero mucho más cerca de Washington está Latinoamérica, de donde vienen todos estos a quien inmigración y el buró del censo un día se les ocurrió llamar 'hispanos'. Y hasta ahora no le he escuchado hablar de hacer una gira por la región.

En Washington hay muchos senadores y congresistas que prestan atención a Jordania e Israel pero casi ninguno le tiene el ojo puesto en Latinoamérica ni a su gente. Si acaso, como el senador Rubio, se preocupan con los gobiernos que no son de su simpatía personal. Pero ni la actuación de Castro, Chávez, Correa o Morales tiene impacto en el deterioro del nivel de vida en Estados Unidos. Y no creo que haya ninguna diferencia entre escapar del comunismo o huir de la miseria. A menos, claro está, que Rubio crea que la miseria genere libertad. Pero cada uno tiene sus prioridades en la vida.

El senador Marco Rubio bien pudiera preocuparse más por la Latinoamérica real. La región al sur del Río Grande es su nicho natural, en Florida también hay inmigrantes ilegales y Marco Rubio fue electo por Florida, no por Jordania o Israel.


ACTUALIZACIÓN (2/20):

Rubio explica a la cadena Sky News el viaje a Jordania e Israel.


jueves, febrero 14

Marco Rubio aprovecha su 'Watergate' para recaudar fondos con la venta de botellas



El senador republicano Marco Rubio ha sabido capitalizar el momento político generado por 'Watergate', la anécdota de la botella de agua que protagonizó durante su intervención el martes por la noche durante la respuesta a un discurso del presidente Barack Obama. El senador republicano ha lanzado una campaña de recaudación de fondos a través de la venta de botellas de aluminio con su nombre.
En un mensaje publicado en su cuenta de Twitter en la noche del miércoles, Rubio invita a sus seguidores a entraren en la página web de su comité de acción política (PAC, por sus siglas en inglés) ‘Reclaim America’ (Recuperemos a Estados Unidos) y comprar la botella metálica, blanca y con su apellido 'Rubio' escrito en rojo a lo alto.
"Si donas hoy 25 dólares o más, te mandamos una botella de agua de Marco Rubio. Envía a los detractores liberales el mensaje de que Marco Rubio no solo te inspira, sino que también te hidrata", dice el anuncio desplegado en la página en Internet del comité de acción política. A su vez, el tuit enviado por el senador cubanoamericano agrega: "Consigue hoy tu botella de agua de Marco".
El miércoles por la noche, Rubio protagonizó un insólito momento cuando interrumpió su discurso y se agachó un instante para tomarse un sorbo de agua de una pequeña botella de agua marca 'Poland Spring'. El episodio se transformó de inmediato en la comidilla del día de todos los canales de televisión y redes sociales.
"Hice un discurso en español de 18 minutos y no me hacía falta agua. Solamente pasa en inglés. No podía más, la boca se me había secado de tanto hablar entre dos discursos. Esas cosas pasan. Dios tiene una manera de recordarnos que somos humanos a cada rato», explicó Rubio a la cadena CNN en Español.
El senador fue el primer político estadounidense que pronunció en dos idiomas, inglés y español, la respuesta oficial opositora al discurso anual del presidente de Estados Unidos sobre el estado de la nación. 
© ELMUNDO.es 2013

martes, febrero 12

Los 10 segundos de gloria de una botellita de agua



No fue el momento más feliz en la historia de las respuestas republicanas a un discurso sobre el estado de la nación, pero tampoco le veo nada de extraordinario más allá de un instante jocoso. No creo tampoco que esos segundos de gloria de la botella de agua afectarán la carrera de Marco Rubio, pero es algo que lo va a perseguir para siempre.

Preocupa más que haya dicho que todavía vive en un barrio de clase trabajadora cuando la residencia está a la venta por más de 600.000 dólares. El senador republicano ha decidido mudarse a Washington con su familia, porque quiere que sus hijos vayan a la escuela allí.

Lo que sí puede tener impacto en su futuro es que se enmarañó en una serie de explicaciones sobre temas que Obama nunca abordó en su discurso. Si se transforma en un hábito, entonces si puede ser un problema porque la tendencia es siempre preguntarle sobre lo actual. Si Rubio insiste en vivir apartado de las preocupaciones diarias de la gente – y su rechazo al ‘Dream Act’ el año pasado es un ejemplo – entonces no tendrá un futuro muy brillante. Una cosa es enfrentar la prensa actual, otra el escrutinio de los media nacionales. Sospecho que Rubio cambió su reino por una botella y que ella es la gran ganadora de esta noche.

viernes, febrero 8

Sube en picada la tensión entre Univision y la oficina del senador Marco Rubio


Univision staffer attacks Sen. Marco Rubio on Facebook

 (from The Miami Herald)


“Oh. wow, the loser is going to speak after our President,” the Univision employee wrote on the Facebook page of Sen. Marco Rubio’s spokesman.


TIME MAGAZINE AND SEN. MARCO RUBIO
Time magazine put Sen. Marco Rubio on its cover in its latest edition, dubbing him “The Republican savior.”
The attention from Time is part of a growing fascination by national media with the Cuban-American senator, who has recently delved into the contentious immigration debate in Congress. Time says Rubio is the “new voice of the GOP.”
Rubio responded to the Time cover in a tweet: “There is only one savior, and it is not me. #Jesus”

MCAPUTO@MIAMIHERALD.COM

A top assistant to a Univision news boss trashed Sen. Marco Rubio on the Facebook page of the Republican’s aide, raising new questions about possible pro-Democratic, anti-Rubio bias inside the powerful Spanish-language network’s Doral headquarters.
The latest incident began Wednesday night after Rubio’s spokesman, Alex Burgos, announced the high-profile Florida senator would give the GOP’s first-ever bilingual rebuttal to President Obama’s State of the Union speech.
That led Univision employee Angelica Artiles to let loose a string of partisan criticisms.
“Oh. wow, the loser is going to speak after our President,” Artiles wrote on spokesman Alex Burgos’ Facebook page at 9:33 p.m. Wednesday. “Anything to get publicity. Ask him to do us a favor and stay home that night.”
Sentiments like that reflect the prevailing political feeling among Univision’s higher ups at its Doral headquarters, say Univision insiders. Artiles is executive assistant to Daniel Coronell, Univision’s vice president of news.
The network is owned by a major Democratic donor who has accused Rubio and other Republicans of having an “anti-Hispanic” stand on immigration that’s “despicable.”
In August, someone used Univision’s official Facebook account to attack Rubio during the Republican National Convention in Tampa.
“Beyond his ideology, Rubio is a mediocre politician who contradicts the values he says he represents. Jeb Bush is more Latino and talented than him,” the Facebook posting said.
When first alerted by the website BuzzFeed, Univision announced it struck the statement and replaced it with a statement in Spanish that said: “An unpleasant comment not authorized by Univision News was posted on this page. That comment does not represent the views of Univision News and we have taken steps to ensure that this situation does not happen again.”
And a year before that Facebook incident, Rubio clashed with Univision’s news chief, Isaac Lee, when his news team decided to run a story about a quarter-century-old drug bust involving the senator’s brother in law.
Univision began reporting the drug-bust story after Rubio rebuffed repeated interview requests with the network, which had been critical of Rubio’s opposition to liberal immigration policies that Univision personalities have promoted.
Univision insiders and Rubio staffers told The Herald that Lee offered to soften or kill a story about the drug bust if the Senator cooperated with the network by sitting down for an interview. Rubio refused. The story about the drug bust ran on its national news broadcast.
Lee denied offering a quid pro quo. He wouldn’t speak with The Herald for its original piece, and instead issued a written statement. But after the report, Lee sat down with the New Yorker and admitted he did offer “options” to Rubio’s staff, including Burgos, concerning his cooperation.
For this latest tussle, Burgos refused to comment.
Artiles didn’t return an email, calls or a text message. Her Facebook account appeared inactive and she deleted her comments on Burgos’ Facebook page, but not before others copied them and sent them to The Herald.
Univision had no comment.
Both Artiles and Burgos were far more talkative on Wednesday. After Artiles called Rubio a “loser,” Burgos responded with an attack on Obama.
“While you may be content with mediocrity under this President, I am not,” Burgos wrote. “And fortunately neither are patriots like Marco Rubio who have opportunities like next Tuesday night to offer an alternative way forward. I am proud to work for him and actually feel sorry for you for writing this.”
Artiles shot back: "Patriot? LOL Alex Burgos."
She then used a diminutive term for Rubio’s first name, “Marquito,” and proceeded to compare him to a Disney dwarf, a “slave boy” and a “fool” who was passed over by Republican Mitt Romney on his presidential ticket last November.
Burgos stopped responding, but others took up Rubio’s cause and attacked Artiles for being a “troll,” internet slang for someone who posts inflammatory statements to gin up responses. The conversation went back and forth in English and Spanish.
“I see that all the mojoncitos [’little turds’] have come out to defend the principal turd, Marquito,” she wrote in Spanish. “I am laughing all the way to the White House :).”
Carlos Curbelo, a Miami-Dade Republican School Board member, joined the fray. Curbelo said he didn’t realize Angelica worked for Univision until the day after the fact, when he confirmed her employment.
“ Qué chusmería,” Curbelo wrote Wednesday night, which roughly translates to something like “what riffraff.”
Artiles: “Curbelo, the riffraff might be you. I haven’t said anything ‘riffraffy.’ Wake up and join the Democratic Party unless you want to remain losers all your lives.”
Curbelo: “I think it’s riffraff to call ‘losers’ people who disagree with you on political matters. Your tone is deplorable and it’s that same tone that keeps our elected officials from agreeing to take on great challenges that threaten the viability of our country. Lastly, even more riffraff is the use of the word ‘little turds’ to refer to professionals and parents who are expressing their opinions.”
Artiles: “Curbelo, losers are the ones who lost the elections, this is what is called freedom of expression. We are all professionals and being parents is nothing out of this world, nor because of that does one stop being a little turd. And Marquito only wants to talk about immigration NOW because he lost. I know well all his lies and his vanity.”
The exchange underscores the passion that Rubio and the issue of immigration provoke both outside Univision and inside its newsroom.
It also heightens conservative concerns that the network, the most-watched by Spanish-language viewers in North America, tilts its coverage in favor of Democratic-leaning immigration policy.
Some Republicans have complained that Univision’s recent treatment of Democratic New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez — a liberal immigration reform leader under FBI investigation — has been far kinder than the network’s interview of the Republican Rubio last year. Rubio and Menendez have joined forces to fashion a bipartisan immigration-reform plan.
After tussling with Univision in 2011, Rubio finally granted with Univision’s Jorge Ramos, who has crusaded for the pro-immigrant DREAM Act that Rubio opposes.
Rubio had rebuffed Ramos numerous times before that, only to face the story about his brother-in-law’s drug bust and the clash with Lee, the Univision news chief.
After The Herald reported about the conflict with Univision, Lee went on a public-relations offensive in which the New Yorker and Columbia Journalism Review. CJR failed to disclose it has a relationship with Univision and Lee, who was recently featured at a Miami event promoted by the journalism school and the network.
In the New Yorker piece, Lee didn’t just admit that he offered Rubio’s staff a deal. He also acknowledged it covers immigration with a bias.
“According to Univision’s news president, Isaac Lee, the network is openly committed to ‘pro-Hispanic’ immigration reform,” the New Yorker wrote.
The owner of Univision, major Democratic donor Haim Saban, was more partisan than Lee and fumed in an email to the New Yorker over the way that the GOP presidential candidates boycotted a proposed Florida debate in January in retaliation for the network’s report on Rubio and his brother-in-law.
Said Saban: “The fact that Rubio and some Republican Presidential candidates have an anti-Hispanic stand that they don’t want to share with our community is understandable but despicable.”
For Republicans like Curbelo, those comments are part of the atmosphere of Univision that undercuts the work of many good reporters.
“I was shocked to learn this was a Univision Network employee,” Curbelo told The Herald. “This again points to an unfortunate anti-Rubio, anti-Republican culture at Univision which threatens the network’s credibility and raises serious doubts about its political impartiality.”




(Se puede clikear en las imágenes para ampliarlas).

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/02/08/v-fullstory/3224442/univision-staffer-attacks-sen.html#storylink=cpy